How to run a PR top up system with multi seat constituencies

// July 5th, 2010 // elections

Seats won by each party in the 2005 German fed...
Image via Wikipedia

the point of multi seat constituencies is to provide the electorate with a choice not alone of party but of personnel. It is in effect a potential instant primary system. However political parties don’t see it like that and tend towards running the minimal slate of candidates because they are currently fearful of using it as such because of the effect of transfers on the number of seats they get.

What if that problem was to be corrected by the allocation of the total number of seats in the Dail on the basis of your share of national 1st preferences and not on the basis of STR_PR but that PR-STV was instead used to decide who would elected.

Leaving aside the idea of reducing the size of the Dail itself as it complicates the illustration below.

We would have 123 of the existing 166 TDs elected by from the multi-seat constituencies as at present but once the counts have completed that the remaining 43 of 166 seats would be allotted to the parties smallest first on the basis of which of their candidates had the highest number of votes before being eliminated or perhaps not eliminated but simply not elected (the last man standing scenario). It would be proportionate yet also ensure that the public were deciding who was getting elected and not some closed insider type party list system. And it wouldn’t hurt parties if they ran 8 candidates in a 5 seater which would mean more choice for the voters.

Enhanced by Zemanta

One Response to “How to run a PR top up system with multi seat constituencies”

  1. [...] would contend that an alternative view might be that an electoral system that did not serve to penalise political parties for taking chances on candidate…, whether male or female, that the electorate might potentially decide to be wrong for them would [...]

Leave a Reply